Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.provenanceSEDICI-
dc.creatorAlzúa, María Laura-
dc.creatorCruces, Guillermo-
dc.creatorRipani, Laura-
dc.date2010-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-19T20:06:56Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-19T20:06:56Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifierhttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/3654-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10915/3654-
dc.identifierhttp://cedlas.econo.unlp.edu.ar/download.php?file=archivos_upload/doc_cedlas95.pdf-
dc.identifierissn:1853-0168-
dc.identifier.urihttp://rodna.bn.gov.ar/jspui/handle/bnmm/325193-
dc.descriptionThis paper studies the effect of welfare programs on work incentives and the labor supply of adults in developing countries. The document builds on the experimental evaluations of three programs implemented in rural areas: Mexico's PROGRESA, Nicaragua's Red de Protección Social (RPS) and Honduras' Programa de Asignación Familiar (PRAF). The impact of welfare on labor supply has been widely studied in developed countries, where most recent initiatives attempt to mitigate negative effects on work incentives. The programs under study are conditional cash transfers (CCT), which combine monetary benefits with incentives for curbing child labor and fostering the accumulation of human capital. Unlike their counterparts in developed economies, however, they do not account for potential impacts on the labor supply of adults, and there is little systematic evidence on this aspect despite a wealth of empirical studies on their intended outcomes. Comparable results for the three countries indicate mostly negative but small and non-significant effects of the programs on the employment of adults, no reallocation of labor between agricultural and other sectors, and a reduction in hours worked by adults in eligible households in RPS. Moreover, PROGRESA had a positive effect on beneficiaries' wages. The programs did not imply major disincentives to work, despite substantial transfers, but they had some effects on local labor markets. This mechanism is related to recent findings on the indirect impact of CCTs on ineligible households, and implies that future evaluation studies and designs should account for the equilibrium effects of the interventions.-
dc.descriptionCentro de Estudios Distributivos, Laborales y Sociales (CEDLAS)-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format45 p.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relationDocumentos de Trabajo del CEDLAS-
dc.relationno. 95-
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)-
dc.sourcereponame:SEDICI (UNLP)-
dc.sourceinstname:Universidad Nacional de La Plata-
dc.sourceinstacron:UNLP-
dc.source.urihttp://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/3654-
dc.source.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10915/3654-
dc.source.urihttp://cedlas.econo.unlp.edu.ar/download.php?file=archivos_upload/doc_cedlas95.pdf-
dc.source.uriissn:1853-0168-
dc.subjectEconomía-
dc.subjecttrabajo-
dc.subjectwelfare programs; income support; labor supply; adult work incentives; conditional cash transfers; randomized control trials; developing countries-
dc.titleWelfare programs and labor supply in developing countries : Experimental evidence from Latin America-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion-
dc.typeDocumento de trabajo-
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/documentoDeTrabajo-
dc.coverageAmérica Latina-
Aparece en las colecciones: Universidad Nacional de la Plata. SEDICI

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.