Registro completo de metadatos
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.provenance | CONICET | - |
| dc.creator | Beade, Ileana Paola | - |
| dc.date | 2016-01-15T20:43:42Z | - |
| dc.date | 2016-01-15T20:43:42Z | - |
| dc.date | 2013-01 | - |
| dc.date | 2016-03-30 10:35:44.97925-03 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-29T15:39:15Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2019-04-29T15:39:15Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2013-01 | - |
| dc.identifier | Beade, Ileana Paola; The thing in-itself and its role in the constitution of objectivity. A critical reading of Onof´s reconstruction of transcendental affection; Società Italiana di Studi Kantiani; Studi Kantiani; 26; 1-2013; 110-135 | - |
| dc.identifier | 1123-4938 | - |
| dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/3652 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://rodna.bn.gov.ar:8080/jspui/handle/bnmm/298647 | - |
| dc.description | In this paper, I shall consider some conclusions drawn by Christian Onof in a recent paper, in which the author analyzes the problem of transcendental affection. Onof assumes that Kant´s references to the thing-in-itself as the cause (or ground) of sensible affection require some sort of justification, for -as he claims- these references are grounded in a metaphysical assumption, that is: the existence of something real beyond the subject`s mind. I will suggest, on the contrary, that Kant´s confidence in the existence of a non-subjective reality should not be characterized a metaphysical assumption, and would not require, therefore, any particular justification. The other main issue I will consider concerns the position adopted by Onof in relation to the current debate between the so called two-objects interpretation and the two-aspects interpretation (concerning the critical distinction between appearances and things-in-themselves). Although Onof attempts to go beyond this dichotomy, I will try to show that many of his statements about the thing-in-itself and affection are not incompatible with some conclusions drawn in the frame of the two-aspects interpretation (or epistemic interpretation), which Onof, however, explicitly rejects. | - |
| dc.description | Fil: Beade, Ileana Paola. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina | - |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Società Italiana di Studi Kantiani | - |
| dc.relation | info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.libraweb.net/riviste.php?chiave=29&h=432&w=300 | - |
| dc.relation | info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/issn/1123-4938 | - |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | - |
| dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ | - |
| dc.source | reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) | - |
| dc.source | instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas | - |
| dc.source | instacron:CONICET | - |
| dc.source.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11336/3652 | - |
| dc.subject | KANT | - |
| dc.subject | THING IN ITSELF | - |
| dc.subject | NOUMENON | - |
| dc.subject | Filosofía, Historia y Filosofía de la Ciencia y la Tecnología | - |
| dc.subject | Filosofía, Ética y Religión | - |
| dc.subject | HUMANIDADES | - |
| dc.title | The thing in-itself and its role in the constitution of objectivity. A critical reading of Onof´s reconstruction of transcendental affection | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
| dc.type | info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo | - |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | CONICET | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.