Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.provenanceCONICET-
dc.creatorGomez, Eduardo Alberto-
dc.creatorAmos, Carl-
dc.creatorLi, Michael-
dc.date2017-05-26T20:55:03Z-
dc.date2017-05-26T20:55:03Z-
dc.date2006-12-
dc.date2017-05-17T13:48:21Z-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-29T15:33:00Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-29T15:33:00Z-
dc.date.issued2006-12-
dc.identifierGomez, Eduardo Alberto; Amos, Carl; Li, Michael; Evaluation of sand transport models by in situ observations.; Coastal Education & Research Foundation; Journal Of Coastal Research; 39; 12-2006; 578-581-
dc.identifier0749-0208-
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/17010-
dc.identifier.urihttp://rodna.bn.gov.ar:8080/jspui/handle/bnmm/296305-
dc.descriptionSand transport rates measured from nine deployments of an annular benthic flume off the western Newfoundland coast and Sable Island Bank (Canada), are compared with predictions using: (1) Engelund and Hansen's total load equation; (2) Einstein-Brown's bedload equation; (3) Bagnold's total load equation, modified by Gadd et al.; and (4) Yalin's bedload equation. TheD grain diameters examined were: 0.19mm(15 trials); 0.33mm(37 trials); and 0.50 mm (7 trials). Results showed that equation (1) under-predicted in about a 40% for all the grain sizes. Equations (2) and (4) showed almost the same range of under-prediction: approximately 30% for D = 0.19 mm, 40% for D = 0.33 mm and 50% for D = 0.5 mm. The maximum variations on the observed-predicted ratios were obtained by equation (3), over-predicting by a factor of 2.45 and 1.9 for D = 0.19 mm and D = 0.33 mm, respectively, and under-predicting by a factor of 0.42 for D = 0.5 mm, but showing the highest correlations among all the tested models (R = 0.96 and 0.8 forD = 0.19mmand 0.33 mm, respectively). These variations are related to the inclusion of outliers in the original computation of the grain size dependent -parameter employed by equation (3). Based on the obtained results and through the analysis of published data, a significant improvement on the formulation (3) is suggested.-
dc.descriptionFil: Gomez, Eduardo Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto Argentino de Oceanografía. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Instituto Argentino de Oceanografía; Argentina. Universidad Tecnologica Nacional; Argentina-
dc.descriptionFil: Amos, Carl. Southampton Oceanography Centre; Reino Unido-
dc.descriptionFil: Li, Michael. Bedford Institute of Oceanography Survey; Canadá-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherCoastal Education & Research Foundation-
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.cerf-jcr.org/images/stories/115_gomez.pdf-
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/-
dc.sourcereponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)-
dc.sourceinstname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-
dc.sourceinstacron:CONICET-
dc.source.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/17010-
dc.subjectOceanografía, Hidrología, Recursos Hídricos-
dc.subjectCiencias de la Tierra y relacionadas con el Medio Ambiente-
dc.subjectCIENCIAS NATURALES Y EXACTAS-
dc.titleEvaluation of sand transport models by in situ observations.-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/articulo-
Aparece en las colecciones: CONICET

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.